論國(guó)際法上的集體安全制度—以黎以沖突為視角
摘 要
最近爆發(fā)的黎巴嫩和以色列的沖突是2006年的國(guó)際時(shí)政熱點(diǎn)。此熱點(diǎn)蘊(yùn)涵著1些集體安全問題。本文從介紹該熱點(diǎn)開始，引出對(duì)集體安全法概念的介紹，提出了集體安全法的6點(diǎn)法律特征和3點(diǎn)法律作用。集體安全的立法分為聯(lián)合國(guó)內(nèi)集體安全的立法和聯(lián)合國(guó)外集體安全的立法。在現(xiàn)實(shí)國(guó)際社會(huì)中，兩者之間的關(guān)系不好處理。在執(zhí)法方面，作者結(jié)合黎以沖突個(gè)案發(fā)現(xiàn)并論述集體安全法執(zhí)法過程中存在的否決權(quán)問題、禁止使用武力或威脅的限度問題以及自衛(wèi)的問題。針對(duì)這些問題，作者提出了對(duì)策。
關(guān)鍵詞：集體安全法；黎以沖突；聯(lián)合國(guó)；問題；對(duì)策
ABSTRACT
The recent conflict erupted between Lebanon and Israel was hot spot for international current spot. This hot spot is containing some collective security questions. This article will start from the introduction of the hot spot, which will draw out to the concept explanation of Collective Security Law, and then put forward to six law characteristics and the three-point method law effect of the Collective Security Law. The Collective Security legislation is divided into in the United Nations the collective security legislation and the union overseas collective security legislation. In the reality of international society, the relations between both are hard to handle. In the law enforcement aspect, I take the conflict between Lebanon and Israel as a case and then discuss the problems of veto, the prohibition of use military force or threatening and self-defense during the process of enforcing the Collective Security Law. In view of these questions, the author proposed the countermeasures.
Key words: Collective Security Law, Conflict between Lebanon and Israel, United Nations, Problems, countermeasure
..............................
注：【包括：畢業(yè)，任務(wù)書，開題報(bào)告】
【論國(guó)際法上的集體安全制度—以黎以沖突為視角】相關(guān)文章：
論海事的法律沖突03-25
論品牌定位與渠道沖突03-23
論在先權(quán)利與商標(biāo)專用權(quán)沖突03-28
論服務(wù)企業(yè)虛擬經(jīng)營(yíng)戰(zhàn)略的研究視角03-22
論《呼蘭河傳》中兒童視角的運(yùn)用03-06
論旅游產(chǎn)品營(yíng)銷渠道的沖突與解決方法03-17
論《德伯家的苔絲》中文明與自然的沖突03-11